Breaking barriers: Improving post-hospital care for opioid use disorder in skilled nursing facilities

As opioid-related hospitalizations rise, skilled nursing facilities could offer a crucial bridge to recovery for patients with opioid use disorder. However, stigma, regulatory hurdles and funding challenges limit their potential. New research highlights policy solutions to ensure these facilities can better meet the needs of a growing and aging population with OUD.

The number of drug-overdose deaths in the U.S. has declined over the last two years. However, 96,000 lives are projected to be lost to the drug crisis in 2024 alone. This ongoing epidemic has also led to a rise in hospitalizations related to opioid use and a growing need for post-acute care.

Following a hospital stay, patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) may stabilize enough that they no longer require intensive hospital care but could still benefit from medical attention before returning home. For these patients, skilled nursing facilities (SNFs)—inpatient facilities designed for short-term care needs without the high costs associated with hospitals—can be a solution.

But there are obstacles: People with OUD face barriers to admission to SNFs due to stigma, financial constraints and regulatory obstacles. SNFs also often lack adequate funding and staff, especially for Medicaid patients. Further, providing methadone, one of three proven treatments for OUD, is difficult due to federal regulations that limit the distribution of these medications to opioid treatment programs (OTPs).

A team of researchers led by Patience Moyo Dow, associate professor of health services, policy and practice at Brown, has published a policy commentary outlining strategies to improve access to care and medication for people with OUD in SNFs. They stress potential policy changes that address stigma against people with OUD, better financial support for SNFs and stronger SNF-hospital partnerships that could ease the transitions of patients between facilities.

“One key motivator for this research is the aging population in the U.S. with OUD,” said Dow. “Data suggests that the prevalence of OUD among older adults is increasing, and this group is also experiencing higher rates of overdose fatalities. Older adults, by nature, tend to use SNFs more frequently due to age-related factors like reduced independence and chronic conditions.”

With this study, the researchers are seeking to prepare the health care system for the rise in older patients with OUD who require post-acute care, ensuring their unique needs are met effectively.

One of the research team’s key recommendations is to expand access to medications for opioid use disorder—or MOUD—in SNFs. Here, progress has been made with support from the U.S. Department of Justice, which found that SNFs violate the Americans with Disabilities Act when they refuse to admit a patient who takes MOUD.  Additionally, in 2022, the Drug Enforcement Administration eliminated its requirement that buprenorphine be dispensed by trained clinicians.

Unlike buprenorphine, methadone can only be dispensed at opioid treatment programs or methadone clinics—not at SNFs. This means SNFs must partner with local opioid treatment programs, sometimes transporting residents to clinics. This can be costly and logistically difficult.

Patience Moyo Dow Associate professor of health services, policy and practice
 
Woman smiling

When SNF administrators spoke with Dow and her team, they frequently cited the lack of trained clinicians as a barrier to providing buprenorphine. But now that the training requirement has been removed, researchers see an opportunity to expand MOUD access. However, it is not yet clear if these policy changes have significantly improved access to buprenorphine in SNFs.  

Methadone, another MOUD, poses additional challenges. “Unlike buprenorphine, methadone can only be dispensed at opioid treatment programs (OTPs) or methadone clinics—not at SNFs,” Dow said. “This means SNFs must partner with local OTPs, sometimes transporting residents to clinics. This can be costly and logistically difficult.”

In Rhode Island, some OTPs, like CODAC, deliver pre-dosed methadone directly to SNFs, and there have been expansions in take-home methadone programs. “These are promising steps,” Dow said, “but broader policy changes—like allowing SNFs to dispense methadone directly—could make a significant difference.”

Dow points to stigma as an additional challenge—both toward individuals with OUD and the use of MOUD itself. “Even with regulatory changes, stigma can limit adoption,” she said. “Addressing this requires national efforts, including education and advocacy from SNF leaders to normalize the use of these treatments.”

“ Our health care system is fragmented, often separating addiction care from medical care. For individuals needing both, SNFs must ensure treatment continuity. ”

Patience Moyo Dow Associate professor of health services, policy and practice

Dow cautions that while SNFs are well-positioned to provide some level of care for OUD, they are not suitable for everyone. “Patients needing intensive inpatient addiction treatment shouldn’t be placed in SNFs unless it’s absolutely necessary,” she said. “Our health care system is fragmented, often separating addiction care from medical care. For individuals needing both, SNFs must ensure treatment continuity. As an example, patients initiated on MOUD in a hospital might lose access when transferred to a SNF due to the lack of infrastructure.”

Together with expanding access to medications and addressing stigma, Dow recommends that SNFs explore partnerships with community organizations like Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous to integrate support and mental health services, given the high overlap between OUD and mental health conditions.

“While SNFs can’t do it all, they’re an important touchpoint in the continuum of care,” Dow said.  “Recognizing their role and expanding their capacity could significantly improve outcomes for individuals with OUD.”