Health Care’s Carbon Problem

Despite being on the front lines of the climate crisis, the health care sector is also one of the greatest contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. A new study from Brown researchers looks at these decarbonizing efforts across the globe.

The health care sector is responsible for 8.5% of the United States’ greenhouse gas emissions, marking it as a notable source of environmental concern. A recent study from Brown researchers emphasizes its role in both contributing to climate change and mitigating its impacts. The study, published in Current Environmental Health Reports, examines the health care policies and practices of dozens of countries aimed at curbing emissions within health care, as well as the systems needed for their implementation. It frames the climate crisis as a catalyst for health care to evolve and innovate in order to prepare for future disruptions and build sustainable and climate-resilient systems. 

The study, co-authored by Emily Hough, senior fellow in health services, policy and practice at Brown, and Arielle Cohen Tanugi-Carresse, a Ph.D. candidate in economics at the Université Paris-Est Créteil and senior research affiliate at Brown, underscores the challenge of decarbonizing the health care sector’s supply chain, which is the greatest source of its emissions, representing 82% of the sector’s total greenhouse gas output.

In their paper, “Supporting Decarbonization of Health Systems—A Review of International Policy and Practice on Health Care and Climate Change,” Hough and Tanugi-Carresse examine the commitments of 73 countries to curb emissions within health care and the policies and delivery systems needed for their implementation.

“Health care is often the first line of defense when it comes to addressing the impacts of major climate events, such as floods, fires and drought,” Hough said. “However, we also have to recognise that it is a major contributor to climate change through its emissions, which are particularly high in high income countries. Our work aimed to explore which countries recognise this challenge and have made commitments or are taking action to reduce emissions.”

The paper describes international initiatives like the COP26 Health Program, now rebranded as the Alliance for Transformation Action on Climate and Health, which was launched in 2021 to encourage countries to develop low-carbon, climate-resilient health systems. By September 2022, 60 nations had pledged their support to the program; 21 countries went further to set a net-zero commitment.

Several countries, including Norway, Columbia and Australia, have started evaluating their emissions and are strategizing on reduction measures. In the U.S., the Biden administration has called upon health organizations to endorse the Health Sector Climate Pledge, while the Netherlands has refreshed its Green Deal on sustainable health care practices. The researchers identified 15 countries with national action plans for decarbonization.

It is great to see so many countries commit to low carbon, sustainable health systems and to see the introduction of more and more voluntary pledges to reduce emissions in healthcare services. Delivering on those ambitions will, however, take action and needs to be monitored by robust emissions reporting to ensure that commitments are delivering a tangible impact and not ‘greenwashing’.

Emily Hough Senior Fellow in Health Services, Policy and Practice
 
Woman smiling

While broad commitments to decarbonization are a step in the right direction, Hough and Tanugi-Carresse point to a critical gap: the majority of climate pledges lack specific courses of action. The UK National Health Service stands out as the exception, being the first to publish a concrete roadmap to achieve a net-zero health system by 2045, setting an example for more countries to follow suit with actionable programs.

“It is great to see so many countries commit to low carbon, sustainable health systems and to see the introduction of more and more voluntary pledges to reduce emissions in healthcare services,” Hough said. “Delivering on those ambitions will, however, take action and needs to be monitored by robust emissions reporting to ensure that commitments are delivering a tangible impact and not ‘greenwashing’.” 

The study suggests several strategies to reduce health care emissions, including converting to renewable energy, embracing green technologies and procurement practices, and emphasizing preventive care. It also calls for green infrastructure, efficient waste management and sustainable food and transport systems.

The researchers note that there is a bifurcated pathway between reducing emissions and adapting to climate’s impacts. Low- and middle-income countries,  producing far lower emissions, are rightly focused more on adaptation due to their vulnerability to climate effects. National adaptation plans are essential in these circumstances, requiring international support and investment. 

Hough and Tanugi-Carresse stress that the impacts of climate change are not only more severe for low- and middle-income countries, but also for low-income families and those with disabilities, making it an issue of both health and equity.

“The climate emergency is a health emergency, so health care needs to be taking climate change seriously,” Hough said. “Adapting to the impacts of climate change is important, but so is the need to reduce health care’s contribution to the problem. There are some well evidenced interventions that healthcare providers can take to reduce their emissions, but more work is needed to develop low carbon care pathways.”